Friday, November 14, 2008

The Rise Of Fascism In The USA: History Repeating itself

Pretty scary....
Alarmist? I think not but judge by yourselves.
They didn't take Hitler serious, did they? And the so called 'intellectuals' in the 1930's were always ready with the apologetic rationalizations, the same breed we see today explaining away the evil, the absurd and the horrible.

This son of a bitch is to be feared. The only way for Obama to counter the military in a coup against the Constitution, is for Obama to have a private army with tentacles deep into every local community. Now we know this was no casual idea. When we first saw the tape of Obama insisting on a National Police for, we thought, “Whatever…cops, something vague about national police, but then we watched again and very, very alarming things jumped. Things which would only not be alarming to a person with a mental capacity significantly below that of the average adult. This National Police Force of Obama’s would have to be as well-funded and powerful, his own words, as the current military is. You know, the one whose primary loyalty was to America, not Obama? And now we find this bombshell. Now we know this was no casual idea floated once during the campaign. Listen to the detail down to which he and Emanuel have thought this through. And listen the reporter having dinner with Rahm sound so incredulous to this planned Police State, and Rahm try to so oily pass it off as if it were a benign occurence, despite it’s obvious Orwellian enormity. Just listen as the reporter feels the inherent evil at his marrow, and how he almost can’t believe what he is hearing, but trying to remain cool and not insult Emanuel by calling him an obvious Nazi.

Domestic civil conscription. And guess what? Those forced in will be sent to 90 day indoctrination and training camps.

Being locally based they will know who in the hood has guns, and who does or doesn’t like Obama. You will literally wake up and find that your neighbor is part of an invading army. But you will already be surrounded. Because they live with you.

In a 2006 interview with Ben Smith of the NY Daily News, Rahm Emanuel, who will be Barack Obama’s White House chief of staff, laughed, s if to say, “Ahhh, don’t worry man, trust me.”, at a reporter’s concerns about how far-reaching Obama’s mandatory Armed Civil-Service plan would be.

Pat’s take and more, on Emanuel

Before you listen to the vid with the audio of the Chicago plot, first watch this tape, the first piece of public evidence to surface during the campaign, of Obama’s plans for his de facto private army, his Gestapo. Listen carefully to the shocking words, over and over. “We can no longer rely on the military for our national security…a civilian force that is just as strong, just as powerful”

And this would be a localized force, your neighbors who already know you, what you think politically, and if you have guns and where you keep them. Listen to these words. They precisely describe what would be needed to succesfully launch a coup that the military couldn’t stop, and the force that would be needed to neutralize any domestic insurgency against the new Regime, and ensure it’s iron-fisted control of the nation.

Bit by bit, all the pieces are coming together. The plan was to take over not by revolution, but through the system itself. Institutionalize enough voter fraud to ensure electoral success, establish economic and other crises in order to stage a sort of systemic coup (think Emanuel, Frank and Obama ever discussed how much damage garbage loans handed out by Freddie and Fannie could do to the country. And, oh, coincidence of coincidences, the only business ACORN was in other than creating fake votes, was pressuring banks into writing bad mortgage loans. Who was Acorn’s star personnell trainer? Barack Hussein Obama. Just click on that “all the pieces” link.), and execute the coup and sustain it’s control through a new, separately established military to counter the existing one. Crazy? It’s all here. In their own words. This has been in the works for years, it seems clear, and which makes sense. You don’t come into this much power so simply without a lot of work and time behind it. And you don’t come into power with nothing but a band of revolutionaries as friends, by sheer coincidence. You come into power with nothing but a band of revolutionaries as friends because of them: you and your friends are determined to see a revolution through to its success, and have been working together for years to get to this point.

Could this all be wrong? Of course. But why is it, day after day, the notion is further affirmed by some piece of new evidence, not disaffirmed?

Remember that sick to your stomach feeling you got at seeing the vids of the Obama Youth. The sick to your stomach feeling you got when you saw the Obama calls for a Gestapo vid? How it only got worse when you played it again and really listened? You didn’t feel that way for no reason. Your instincts were indeed telling you something, and reminding you of something.
And as one Georgia congressman just said, this is
exactly what Hitler and the Soviets did.

Obama's Führer aspirations

It sends chills down the spine....

The Plan: Big Ideas For America

Repeating the evils from history...
This is a must read!

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the 700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of "we the people," who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is medicare and our entire government, our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about)-the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more imporant.)

Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change.


I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning.

And I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected to office, a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world.

He did it with a compliant media-did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and . . . change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

(Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.)

Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.

Don't forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years-a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency-it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am.

No comments: