Thursday, November 13, 2008

Obamagate: Fight To Reveal Obama's Birth Certificate Continues

They are scared.
The Obamaniacs are doing everything they can to cover up with lies upon lies.
This post is a reply to the cooked up misleading comment on Obamagate.
There is only one way to find out and be sure and that is by evidence of the court that the messiah's birth certificate is genuine and not the phoney looking birth certificate produced by the extremist and radical leftist DailyKos on photobucket.
By the first of December 2008 the messiah will have to produce his birth certificate to the US supreme court - Question will be if it is the same as the phoney birth certificate they claim to be real cooked up by DailyKos? Or will it be another forgery - To compare the DailyKos phoney birth certificate from Hawaii here is an original birth certificate - The difference is unmistakenly.
Here is an extract of the plaintiff against the messiah. Impressive list of aliases, and as a side kick Obama chosed his current name Barack Hussein Obama after a trip to Pakistan, isn't that just grand.
No wonder they continue arguing and attacking everyone raising any question of an already elusive, phoney, lying crypto-Marxist narcissist megalomaniac Barack hussein Obama - Remember Joe the Plumber, they called out for his murder on KGO radio for asking the wrong question of the messiah and the mainstream media went down on him in the best of fascist thug style worthy of the USSR or Hitler's Germany - This illustrates who they are by their own merit, no more, no less.
The hypocrisy of the fascistoid Obamaniacs is nauseous and disgusting, the slightest technicality which could disqualify an opponent and they go wailing and screaming - Yet they cannot stomach the dish they so eagerly dish out when they chose to breach the US constitution in order to make a Marxist revolution in the USA permitting an extremist radical to be elected president by all the fraudulent methods available all which is subscribed under the euphemic buzzword 'Change' meaning Communist revolution as spelled out by Obama's ideological guru Saul Alinsky.
Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov was right when he warned that, through media manipulation, Americans would be brainwashed and would allow their country to be taken over by Marxists - Watch HERE.
By December 1, 2008, Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate. “I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate,” says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. “They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution.” (from comments on the featured article)
Fight To Reveal Obama's Birth Certificate Continues
By John P. Connolly, The Bulletin
Two of the plaintiffs in court cases against Sen. Barack Obama, the president-elect, are working to move their cases forward before his presidential inauguration.
Philip J. Berg, the attorney who filed suit against Mr. Obama challenging him to produce his original birth certificate to prove he meets the constitutional requirements to serve as U.S. president. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court late in October, in an effort to force Mr. Obama to produce the document.
Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that Mr. Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants are to respond to the writ, on or before Dec. 1.
The judge in Mr. Berg's original case ruled that Mr. Berg does not have standing to enforce the constitutional requirements on a presidential candidate. Mr. Berg appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court.
(What a preposterous arrogance, the Obamaniacs are not shy to openly oppose and disrespect the American constitution, so a lawyer hasn't got the standing to raise a constitutional issue? This illustrates their tyrannist thinking)
"I look forward to receiving defendant Obama's response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States."
Mr. Obama put an electronic photo of a birth certification on his "Fight the Smears" Web site, a document that his critics have found unconvincing. The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan. The Obama campaign was unwilling to release the original document to the court when Mr. Berg filed suit in August, choosing instead to argue against Mr. Berg's standing.
Mr. Berg asserts that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya, as his mother, Ann Dunham, was denied entry to the plane home due to her advanced pregnancy.
(The Obamaniacs argues that the poor mother didn't have the money to travel to Kenya, yet another lie, she was in Kenya during her pregnancy)
Since she was only 18 at the time of Mr. Obama's birth, she would not have passed citizenship on to Mr. Obama. In 1961, citizenship could only be passed on to a child where one parent was an alien should the citizen parent have resided in the U.S. for 10 years, five of those over the age of 14.
The State of Hawaii has refused to release copies of Mr. Obama's birth certificate, because Department of Health officials say the privacy statutes of the state prevent them from doing so to anyone who does not have a "direct and tangible interest" in the record as prescribed in the state statute.
In Honolulu, Andy Martin, a longtime critic of Mr. Obama, filed a lawsuit in October, in an attempt to get the Hawaiian Department of Health to release Mr. Obama's birth certificate records. Mr. Martin announced last week that he plans to get members of the Electoral College to pressure Mr. Obama into presenting his birth certificate.
"We are going to start organizing a 'Goal Line Stand' in the Electoral College to force Barack Obama to produce his original 1961 birth certificate for review by the American people," Mr. Martin said. "Republicans, conservatives and independents have a new rallying point. Don't let Obama pass through the Electoral College until he has produced his original birth certificate and ended the mystery shrouding his origins."
No one, aside from Department of Health officials, has seen the original document. Mr. Martin has a court hearing on Nov. 18 in the Circuit Court for Honolulu, Hawaii to continue his case.

More on the case (from comments on the featured article):
Nov 10, 2008 2 NEW CASES AGAINST OBAMA. This Donofrio v Wells in U.S. Supreme Court may be stronger than Berg v Obama.1) Obama Presidency Challenged By New Jersey Voter re:"natural born citizen" - Donofrio v Wells Before US Supreme Court Obama presidency challenged by New Jersey voter re: "natural born citizen" now before US Supreme Court. Standing not an issue-Birth Certificate not main point of suit. Action was originally filed against both Obama and McCain alleging ineligibility.
Nov 10, 2008 – On October 27, 2008, plaintiff-appellant, Leo Donofrio, a retired attorney acting Pro Se, sued Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, demanding the Secretary execute her statutory and Constitutional duties to police the security of ballots in New Jersey from fraudulent candidates ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States due to their not being "natural born citizens" as enumerated in Article 1, Section 2, of the US Constitution.
Nov 11,08 UPDATE: Later today, I will release my letter to Justice Thomas as a sworn certification detailing the various unorthodox judicial activity my case has suffered. The case is officially named, "Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey".
2) Another case: this one against Obama's Mother by Forensic Psychologist who works for Criminal Justice System and the Courts Accuses Obama's Mother of Fraud on Obama Birth Docs in Hawaii. Dr. T.B. Bradley, Psy. D. Forensic Psychologist who works for the Criminal Justice System and the Courts, accuses Obama's Mother of Fraud on Obama Birth Docs in Hawaii. "Obama's Mother engaged in a pattern of illegal and fraudulent conduct as a result of both of her two children's birth outside of the United States:
(1) Obama, Jr. born in Kenya Africa and
(2) Maya Soetoro born in Jakarta Indonesia, but the mother, a US Citizen, raced to Hawaii after each of her children's birth where she engaged in fraudulent conduct upon the United States by declaring a late registration birth for both children claiming that they were born in Hawaii.
This is for REAL. The election is NOT OVER. Instead of talking let's do something.Take action here:
It's EASY. Just click and send emails to Reps. then send letters/emails to Electors. Every email and letter counts! Please help.FOR PROOF look here:
and here:
LISTEN TO AUDIO of Kenya Grandmother stating that Obama born in Mombassa Kenya:
SoWatch This Interview With Attorney Phillip J. Berg who appealed to U.S. Supreme Court VIDEO:
People in Kenya know something that Americans don't: Obama born in Kenya!

Here's a link where you can sign a petition to force Obama to just release the constitutionally required documents to the public. Its a no brainer, Obama.

Right now there are over 60,000 signatures.


smrstrauss said...

Re: By the first of December 2008 the messiah will have to produce his birth certificate to the US supreme court -

Don't get your hopes up. Only Berg says that by Dec. 1 Obama has to show a document to the supreme court, and it is not believable. Why? Because the Supreme Court is not a court that judges facts. It is an appeals court that judges laws and constitutional issues.

In Berg's case, the legal issue is whether he has standing to sue. In the unlikely case that he won that appeal, the issue he raises - Obama's place of birth -- would be sent to a lower court for a trial on the facts.

That could take some time, if it happens at all.

This document is apparently from Andy Martin, another critic of Obama, who points out some of Berg’s failings.

You can find it at:



Monday, November 10, 2008

The strange behavior of Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg

Why would a Philadelphia lawyer file frivolous claims in federal courts about Barack Obama? Is it possible the lawyer is trying to divert attention from serious questions that exist about Obama’s birth certificate and troubled and confusing family history?

Andy Martin speculates on the bizarre litigation behavior of Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg

Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”




(NEW YORK)(November 11, 2008) Some time in mid-August I began to get phone calls from a lawyer’s office in Philadelphia. The lawyer was Philip J. Berg.

I eventually spoke with Mr. Berg. He explained that he was preparing to file a lawsuit against Barack Obama and a number of other parties. Berg asked if I would review the case before it was filed, and I agreed.

I carefully read Berg’s initial complaint. (Some of the confirming e-mails are in the hands of Patriot Brigade Talk Radio Network.) I advised Berg’s office that his lawsuit would not fly in federal court. His joinder of the Federal Election Commission was utter nonsense. Naming the Democratic Party was questionable. Seeking to enjoin the Party’s convention was silliness. For an ordinary voter to sue Obama was a lost cause; I explained that already this year two judges had ruled individuals lacked legal standing to file such a claim. Berg sent me a revised version of his lawsuit that was equally deficient.

Berg has tried to pretend that his lack of “standing” is a technicality. On the contrary, in federal courts standing is a threshold jurisdictional issue. State courts have broad “general” jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. I explained to Berg how he could file a meritorious lawsuit in state court but he was frantic. “I want to file before the Democratic Convention so I can apply for an injunction,” he said. At that point I decided Berg was a loon and had no further contact.

Mr. Berg did file his loony case, and it began to attract a lot of attention. My initial reaction was sadness at the gullibility of the public. People obviously had no idea that the form and forum of Berg’s lawsuit were totally deficient.

I did not become concerned until a New York radio talk show host who is a friend called me and said “Andy, what about the order for Obama to produce his birth certificate?” I explained to my friend that there was no such order. Berg and his supporters were spreading disinformation or allowing it to be disseminated.

I began receiving more calls and e-mails about Berg’s lawsuit. Berg was escalating the idiocy of his behavior to attract frustrated voters. “Obama admitted he was born in Kenya,” screamed one Berg release. Obama had admitted nothing of the sort. The more irresponsible Berg became, the more e-mail he generated from desperate voters.

Berg’s lawsuit was promptly dismissed, as I had anticipated before it was even filed. Berg was ready with an explanation: there was a conspiracy to deprive him of justice. No such conspiracy existed.

Last month my staff and I discussed whether we should do a column about Berg’s harmful behavior. We decided to ignore him and hope he would go away. Mr. Berg is not going away. He keeps manufacturing false claims to stay in the news and to keep soliciting money.

After Berg lost in the district court, he filed an appeal to the U. S. Court of Appeals. But there was no “juice” in a mere appeal. Berg was soon asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stop the national election—on the basis of his crackpot lawsuit. Once again Berg was denied relief. And once again Berg was ready with a new round of disinformation.

I started to get e-mails telling me the Supreme Court had ordered Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed. The Rules of the Supreme Court allow thirty days to respond; Berg converted that into an “order” from the Court compelling his opponents to respond. Sheer disinformation. There was no “order.”

The false claims about the Supreme Court are what convinced me to reverse my earlier view and write a column questioning Berg’s behavior.

Enough, Mr. Berg.

What’s next from him? What ridiculous claim will he concoct to continue attracting attention?

During this entire period of idiotic behavior Berg was going on talk radio and soliciting funds for his doomed mission.

What should all of this teach us? I have several thoughts for the reader to consider.

First, no one is more opposed to Barack Obama and his hard left warriors than I am. Obama’s minions were not attacking Berg during the campaign; they were attacking me. I was the first one to focus attention on Obama’s evasiveness and deception, four years ago. But while I have attacked Obama, I have also worked hard to anchor all of my claims in evidence, interviews and traditional forms of legal research. That’s what really scares Obama.

When I asked Berg in August how he was going to prove Obama was born in Kenya, he said “I saw it on the Internet.” Not good enough for a federal judge.

Second, Berg likes to identify himself as a “supporter” of Hillary Clinton. That’s garbage. He’s smearing Clinton. Clinton must cringe every time Berg does some new stunt and misuses her name. Berg has no connection with Clinton. More misuse.

Third, is Berg’s motive to collect money from frustrated voters? I don’t know. He does ask for cash, so that may be the explanation. To be sure, my Committee also receives donations, but we have funded two trips to Hawai’i for Obama research and investigation, and a birth certificate lawsuit scheduled for a hearing on November 18th in Honolulu.

Fourth, could Berg be professionally incompetent? Berg has been criticized by judges:

Finally, is Berg really an Obama operative? Berg’s behavior is so far outside the normal confines of legal practice that his conduct is aberrant as well as abhorrent. To date, only Obama has benefited from Berg’s misbehavior. When an Obama opponent acts crazy, Obama’s people say “See.”

There are very legitimate questions about Obama’s birth certificate and family history. By filing frivolous cases (a case filed in the wrong court seeking the wrong relief against the wrong defendants is frivolous) and misusing legitimate issues, Berg obscures the seriousness of the underlying questions about Obama’s past. And, inevitably, journalists link Berg and others (such as myself) together, despite the fact that we have absolutely no connection. I, for one, do not enjoy being joined to Berg in any form, even a news story.

Likewise, Berg’s use of Clinton’s name benefits Obama by discrediting Clinton as a possible behind-the-scenes Berg supporter, when nothing could be further from the truth. Dirty tricks? Obama and Axelrod are masters of smears by association and deception. Although I am not an enthusiastic believer of the Berg-for-Obama explanation for Berg’s behavior, it still makes a lot of sense.

Certainly no competent attorney who regularly practices in federal court would engage in Berg’s hijinks. At some point Berg could face sanctions for his misconduct and abusive behavior.

So we are left with no clear explanation for why Berg is acting out: (1) is he “crazy” or ill? (2) is he an Obama saboteur? (3) is he a financial flim flam artist using false claims to collect money? (4) is he an incompetent attorney? I can’t say for sure which of those apply. I leave it to the good reader’s common sense to reflect on Berg’s behavior and to decide for him or herself just what Berg’s motivation is.

Helping the anti-Obama movement is not Berg’s mission. Quite the opposite. Berg has helped Obama by discrediting Obama’s opponents. So what is Berg’s game? Let me know what you think.

end quote

Rolf Krake said...

What a load of crap.

Typical for a leftists using Nazi and Stalinist methods attacking and discrediting the messenger raising an uncomfortable issue.

Instead of demanding president Hussein O. to produce his birth certificate they choses to attack and smear everyone raising the issue - The left is surely intellectual bankrupt - A bunch of fascistoid thugs.

Ted said...

Unavoidable scenario: If SCOTUS disqualifies Obama BEFORE 1/20/09 inauguration, McCain is POTUS per remaining electoral college electors; if SCOTUS disqualifies Obama after 1/20/09 inauguration, Hillary likely becomes POTUS per vote of Dem controlled House of Rep. Either way, is clear Obama will NOT be or remain POTUS.

Rolf Krake said...


We can hope the judges respect the US constitution and do the necessary before the 20th of Jan 2009 - Clearly (apparently Kenyanborn)Obama is incapable of producing his birth certificate.

They go to great lengths arguing for the messiah not to produce his birth certificate and spend their resources smearing Philip J Berg instead - It is without doubt that Obama has not got any birth certificate.

smrstrauss said...

Nearly six years have passed since this was published, and Obama was inaugurated president and re-elected president in November 2012 and is still the president currently and NO member of Congress has even called for an investigation of Obama's eligibility.

Every child born on US soil is a Natural Born US citizen except for the children of foreign diplomats, and Obama's birth on US soil has been proven by (1) his Hawaii birth certificate; (2) the repeated confirmation of their sending it to Obama and all the facts on it being the same as what they sent by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii; (3) the public Index Data file; (4) the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the papers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii); (5) the Hawaii teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after hearing of the birth of a child to a woman NAMED STANLEY from the head of obstetrics at Kapiolani Hospital; (6) the INS inspector who checked on Obama's father's residence status and wrote: "They have one child, born in HONOLULU."