Came upon this daring article about the 'clash of civilizations' from the street level, certainly nothing the mainstream medias wish to report from fear for the Political Correct watchdogs.
The islamic way to try and achieve being 'untouchable' through violence, threats, intimidations, destruction of property which lead to what has been known as 'No-Go Zones' - The thought controlling dogma of 'Political Correctness' allow this to flourish.
From: News Views.
What do these KNIFE wounds suffered by an ARMED law enforcement officer have to do with Islam?
The wounds he suffered by misperceiving and miscalculating distance to his knife wielding attacker, because he was armed with a gun, are mild compared to those we will suffer as we continue to misjudge and deny the danger of militant Islam to Western civilization.
To continue to fall for the Islamic disinformation of being a religion of peace instead of it being the religion of body pieces.
Of an "ism" of domination, death and merciless punishment of matters we barely notice as a civilized world, even trivial things such the clothes we wear, but which in the mindset of 1,400 years ago on which Islam insists are approvingly punished by whipping, gang rape, severing limbs, gouging out eyes, cutting off tongues and other crude, dark ages methods.
Executions or punishments are frequently purposely done in public to frighten and discourage dissent and enforce obedience to Allah and to anyone who claims "to speak to and for Allah".
The officer was armed himself but forgot the golden rule of distance, distance, distance. If you have ever wondered why police shoot and kill someone "merely" armed with a knife when they have guns, just look at the photos below.
We continue to ignore that Islamic sharia (religious) law and tenets encourage RAPE and SLAVERY and promote it as a POSITIVE aspect of Islam - as an integral part of the religion not a side effect but a principal tool.
Like the victim of this attack, if we do not distance ourselves from the repeatedly stated and implemented customs of Islam and evaluate how to deal with it as not a "religion" for appeasement but as the virulent proponents of the "religion" as written in the Koran and the hadiths and tenets, then we shall not survive.
An expert on Islam has addressed (below the photos) how it depends on slavery and rape to implement its aims in a way so foreign to us in the West we cannot conceive of it as a reality.
But it is.
Stifled by our Western laws and evironments, it now tries to insert sharia law into our nations as the thin end of a wedge that will overthrow us and create a global Islamic caliphate. Something the Koran and hadiths envisage as a just aim - at any cost to limb and life of the infidels/kafirs.
Here's a visual aid to what we invite by denying and rejecting the dangers that political Islam aims at us and like the knife wielding attacker, fully inends to take out on us by our allowing them close to us.
SLASHED UPPER CHEST
Bill Warner is the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for politicalislam.com.
CSPI’s goal is to teach the doctrine of political Islam through its books and it has produced an eleven book series on political Islam.
Mr. Warner did not write the CSPI series, but he acts as the agent for a group of scholars who are the authors. The Center’s latest book is The Submission of Women and Slaves, Islamic Duality.
Here is part of an interview with FrontPage Magazine:
Slavery is the fruit of Islamic duality.
Mohammed, the master of dualism and submission, used slavery as a tool of jihad because it worked. Mohammed’s life was infused with slavery. Slaves were the lifeblood of Islam. Mohammed, the white man, owned both male and female black slaves. His attitude was pure dualism.
The most disgusting thing about Islamic slavery is not that Muslims enslave others, but that we ignore it. The Muslims have been fed the Koran and the Sunna in their mother's milk. They are doing what is ethical according to Islam. In a strange way, Muslims are to be pitied. A Muslim is the first victim of Islam.
The criticism of whites because of their being involved in slavery is standard fare in the media and the universities.
Try to find a university that even teaches about the killing of 120,000,000 Africans for Muslims to profit from the 24,000,000 resulting slaves.
Blacks define themselves on the basis of slavery. They will not go beyond the white, Christian version of slavery. There is only one theory of history in the black community—the West African Limited Edition version of history.
Blacks will not admit the broad scope of slave history.
Hindu slavery? It never happened.
White and European slavery? It never happened.
Slavery on the East coast of Africa? It never happened.
A massive slave trade through the Sahara into North Africa? It never happened.
Black, eunuchs at the Medina mosque? It never happened.
This incomplete history of slavery is what U.S. and European taxpayers fund in the state universities.
How can black leaders ignore Islam's sacred violence in Africa?
Why aren’t the black columnists, writers, professors, or ministers speaking out? They are ignorant and in total denial. They are the molested children of Islam. They fear angering the Black Moslem Brotherhood and losing the victim status they have establsihed.
Blacks are dhimmis and serve Islam with their silence. There is a deep fear of Islam that makes them overlook and placate Islam.
Arabs are the masters of blacks.
One thing whites and blacks have in common is that their ancestors were enslaved by Islam, and both are too ignorant to know it.
Blacks and whites have a secret shame buried under the denial of being slaves inside Islam.
But the rest of the media and intellectuals line up as dhimmis, too.
One of the marks of a dhimmi under the fourth caliph, Umar, was that a dhimmi was forbidden to study the Koran.
The chief mark of dhimmitude today is ignorance of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. The ignorance of kafir intellectuals about Islam is profound.
They don't know about how jihad killed the 120,000,000 Africans, the 60,000,000 Christians, the 80,000,000 Hindus or the 10,000,000 Buddhists.
Our intellectuals do not know about the Tears of Jihad (detailed in all of our books). That is a lot of death and ignorance—270,000,000 dead. Our intellectuals don't know, don't care and don't bother. They deny.
University Islamic studies never mention the Islamic political doctrine.
The media discusses Islam in terms of political correctness, and multiculturalism. History courses don’t teach about the civilizational annihilation due to jihad.
Religious leaders placate imams in public gatherings and have no knowledge what the imam actually thinks of them. Political thinkers do not even know Islam as a political force.
The problem with this ignorance is that our intellectuals are unable to help us. They do not understand that Islam is a civilization based upon the ideal of dualism.
Islamic ethics and politics have one set of rules for Muslims and another for kafirs.
Our civilization is based upon the ideal of unitary ethics, the Golden Rule. We do not have two sets of laws and ethics, like Islam. Our intellectuals cannot explain what dualism has meant in the past or what it will mean for our future—civilizational annihilation.
Our intellectuals and the media have only one view of Islam—a glorious civilization. (As spoon fed to them).
They have created the "terrorist", a bogus term based upon ignorance. And the "terrorist" is not even a "real" Muslim, but an extremist fundamentalist.
All of these terms are based upon a profound ignorance of Islamic political doctrine and are intended as a false balm to soothe us.
Intellectuals cannot connect the dots of persecution of other intellectuals and artists today, such as Salman Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, the Mohammed cartoon riots, and Daniel Pearl.
This persecution is part of a 1400 year Islamic tradition of keeping all intellectuals and artists in line with the doctrine of political Islam.
But for our intellectuals, there is no history, no connection, no pattern, no doctrine of Islam. Their only doctrine is the doctrine of denial. These intellectuals write our textbooks. Then our tax dollars buy the books to feed the ignorance.
What explains the intellectuals’ silence and ignorance?
The enormous violence of jihad has produced the psychology of the “molested child” syndrome. Intellectuals fear, apologize for, and placate the Islamic abusers, ignoring the violence of the past.
Then they turn around and advise our politicians. The result is an ignorant populace who look to our intellectuals for guidance and find treachery and lies.
They forget that:
Islam’s stand on slavery is based on its political principles of submission and duality.
The principle of submission could not be clearer. By definition a slave is the most submissive of all people. You become a slave only when you have no more choices. A slave has completely submitted to a master.
The principle of duality is shown by the fact that Islam does not enslave Muslims, only kafirs (non-Muslims). Since only kafirs are enslaved, it assures that more of the world submits to Islam.
Islamic slavery is based on the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira (Mohammed’s life) and the Hadith (the Traditions of Mohammed). All three texts say that slavery is permitted, ethical, desirable and a virtue. There is not one single negative word about slavery.
Slavery is seen as a process that brings kafirs to Islam. It is a virtue to free slaves, but Mohammed only freed slaves who submitted to Islam. If the kafir slave does not submit, then their children will. So given enough time, slaves convert to Islam. That is one of the reasons that Islam sees slavery as a positive.
Of course, there is another reason that Islam sees slavery as being so "good" and that is the money.
Mohammed and the other jihadists made a fortune out of enslaving kafirs. Mohammed used the money for more jihad. So slavery financed the spread of Islam and jihad from the beginning.
All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of Mohammed, the perfect being. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted or “good”.
Mohammed repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with kafir females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports that he got first choice of the women.
In one case, he repeatedly demanded one particular woman for himself and swapped two other kafir slave women for his choice. So if Mohammed was involved in the rape of kafirs, then rape is a virtue, not a sin or error.
When Mohammed destroyed the B. Qurayza tribe, all of the adult male Jews were beheaded, so that no husbands were left. Mohammed then took the children and gave them to Muslims to raise as Muslims and he sold off the Jewish women as slaves.
We know from another story that the women were divided into sex slaves and domestic slaves. In one scene, a jihadist is trying to obtain a high ransom for a woman and he is told that her breasts are flat and her mouth is cold, so her value was less. In short, she was only good for work around the house, not in the bedroom.
The Hadith tells of another story where the Muslims used coitus interruptus to avoid impregnating the kafir sex slaves. The reason was purely for business. If the kafir sex slave was pregnant, then she was worth less money.
Islamic doctrine says that kafir women should not be used for prostitutes, only for the pleasure of the master.
When Mohammed attacked the Jews at Khaybar, many moral precedents were set. Sexual slavery received an entire set of rules. Muslims were not to rape pregnant or menstruating women until they had delivered the child or finished their periods. At Khaybar, Mohammed’s god Allah, announced that even married women were fair game for rape.
Mohammed only killed some of the Jews at Khaybar. The male and female survivors were needed to work the land as dhimmis.
(The original dhimmis were semi-slaves with no civil rights. Today, dhimmis are ignorant kafirs who apologize for Islam.)
Since Islam needed the men to work, husbands were left alive. That was the reason that the Koran said that in this case, even with the husbands looking on, it was good to rape the women.
Sexual slavery was not only fun and profitable for the Muslim men, but rape was a powerful tactic of war, then and today. The women are forced into submission to Muslim men and the husbands are humiliated.
Humiliated men are weakened men, so more kafirs were less able to resist Islam.
For some time Mohammed's favorite sex partner was a Christian slave from Egypt named Mary. One of Mohammed's wives caught him in some state of intimacy with Mary in the wife's bedroom and raised hell.
Mohammed promised to not do it again and moved Mary to her own apartment in Medina.
Everything that has been said up to now is not only history; it is Sunna (the example of the perfect pattern of action and morality found in Mohammed).
Rape is Sunna. Rape is not a sin. Rape is permitted and encouraged by Mohammed and the Koran. Islam is the only political system in the world that includes rules for rape and war. Rape is jihad. How good can it get? A Muslim gets to rape a kafir girl and get heaven credits. All jihad is a ticket to Paradise.
The most disgusting aspect of the Islamic rape of kafirs is not the rapes, but the kafir response. Kafirs become dhimmis by ignoring the rapes. I challenge you to find one, even one, mention of Islamic rape in the history books.
Islamic rape is more taboo than the N-word in the Mass Mainstream Media. At least the N-word is acknowledged to exist. Even unicorns exist in media fantasy. But Islamic rape is forbidden to even exist as a fantasy.
And to reach a fevered rant: our so-called "feminist" scholars are absolutely intellectually and morally bankrupt hypocrites.
They are traitors to our culture and a shame and a disgrace. They remain silent in the face of heinous crimes against women. They are arch-dhimmis when they refuse to speak of the Sunna, history and current rapes of our daughters, mothers, and sisters.
And our tax dollars support their evil in our public universities.